Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Search

Archives

<February 2010>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
31123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28123456
78910111213

Categories

Links










# Monday, November 30, 2009
The Shutter Speed of Our Eyes
Posted by richard

121-shutter-speed-of-eye.jpg
Since the advent of photography, artists have been intrigued by its possibilities. Some find it an indispensable component in their work, while others curse its intrusion. One thing we can agree on is that it has had a major influence on representational artwork. Even the devoted plein air artist usually has a trusty camera at their side. Its ability to record a variety of information has made it easier for us to work within the comforts of our studios. It often provides security to those who doubt their abilities. We tend to accept a photograph as fact whereas a painting is held up to greater scrutiny. Confronting this prejudice and acquiring a basic understanding of how photography compares to the human eye, can prove invaluable when attempting to produce representational paintings.

The mechanics of a camera are very similar to the human eye. The retina acts as the film or sensor in digital photography, recording information and processing it into recognizable imagery. The cornea acts like the camera lens, bending light rays through the pupil. The pupil and iris act like the aperture, controlling depth of focus. The missing component is the shutter: that curtain that lets a flash of focused light through the lens to the focal plane of the film. We actually see more like a motion picture or video camera, which is capable of recording a series of quick flashes into constant action, versus the one-shot camera. Vision is a continuous process with the blink breaking the sequence. Science has shown us that the average shutter speed for this human movie picture is somewhere around 1/50th of a second. We are also capable of quickly moving our focus, similar to panning with a camera. This helps to keep things that are in motion in focus.

When photographing subject matter that is in motion, anything slower than 1/50th of a second can appear blurred, while faster shutter speeds can stop action, creating too much detail. Since most handheld photography relies on a faster shutter speed than 1/50th of a second, we can ascertain that we are not really recording a human perception. Instead, the reference photo has stopped action and produced a frozen image. In the landscape this issue often arises when photographing running water. If the camera records the water at anything above or below approximately 1/50th of a second, an artificial appearing reference is produced. To test this, mount a camera on to a tripod for stability, expose a swift running creek at a shutter speed of approximately 1/50th of a second, then lower the shutter speed to 2 seconds, and finally raise the shutter speed to 1/1000th or 2/1000th of a second. The aperture will have to be adjusted to create a good exposure, which will alter the depth of focus. The appearance of the running water will be very noticeably different between each exposure.

It is not that these lovely reference photos cannot be utilized for inspiration and detailed information, but a degree of manipulation needs to be applied to make the painting appear real. As a dear painting friend once said, “We must record the scenes in front of us on the emulsion of our minds.” Our job is to harness the photograph as a tool, instead of becoming its slave.

[pictured above] A plein air painting of a swift creek.




Monday, November 30, 2009 6:06:29 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [4]
# Monday, November 23, 2009
A Pastel Thanksgiving
Posted by richard

120-pastel-thanksgiving.jpgAs we slip from fall in to the throes of winter, the days become shorter and more contemplative. Gone is the long light of summer that motivates so many of us to pack our pastels out on location for the plein air painting experience. In its place, we find ourselves warmly nestled in the comfort of our studios attempting to resolve many of those outdoor adventures. This is also the time for holidays in much of the world. No sooner is one ended than the next is upon us.

Thanksgiving in the United States and Canada has always been a personal favorite. It's a time when family and friends gather to focus on the things they're most thankful for. Of course, every day should be filled with a degree of appreciation, but it doesn’t hurt to have a special day once a year set aside for forced reflection. With the approach of this year’s festivity, I couldn’t help but be aware of all the things I have to be thankful for as a pastel artist.
 
Here's my short list:
  • The manufactures, both large and small, that have made it so much easier to experience all the qualities and personalities pastel has to offer.
  • The availability of a wide variety of pastel surfaces to choose from, each offering new possibilities for expression.
  • The advent of Museum Glass and low reflection AR glass, which make it easier to display pastel paintings without the annoyance of reflections interfering.
  • The hardworking members of all the pastel societies that volunteer their time and efforts in pursuit of promoting the medium.
  • Urania Christy Tarbet, for having envisioned a society (IAPS) under which to umbrella the pastel organizations. The IAPS convention, held every two years, is like a huge family reunion.
  • The staff of The Pastel Journal and F+W media, for all their devotion to the pastel community. And to Janie Hutchinson and Maggie Price for having had the idea in the first place, and the tenacity to make it happen.
  • The enthusiastic painters who share in the passion to communicate a bit of themselves with the medium of Degas and Cassatt, allowing us to see the world through their eyes. It wasn’t that long ago that pastel was relegated to a mere fragile sketching medium or sidewalk chalk. Today it's taken seriously and hangs right along side oil because of their efforts—THANK YOU! 
Please feel free to post your pastel thankful comments during this week of reflection.
 
Pictured: A feast of pastels; seconds are allowed—Bon Appetit!



MORE RESOURCES FOR ARTISTS

* Online Seminars for Fine Artists
* Instantly download fine art magazines, books & video workshops
* Sign up for your Artist's Network email newsletter & receive free fine art tips & demos




Monday, November 23, 2009 2:20:48 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [10]
# Monday, November 16, 2009
The Problem with Green, Part 2
Posted by richard

119-green-part2.jpg
In last week’s blog, I split Malinda Wiesner’s question concerning the use of green into two parts. In part 1, my advice was to acquire as many “mixed pigment” green pastels as possible for inclusion in your palette, avoiding the harsh raw green pigments like Viridian and Phthalo. This week, the discussion continues with a few more tips that I hope prove helpful when dealing with the issue of green in landscape painting.

Whenever color is concerned, it's best to begin with the color wheel. By studying the relationships of individual colors and how they interact with each other, we develop a better understanding of why certain colors work when placed together. This is a powerful tool in choosing what to place in a painting. Nature works. It shares an atmospheric relationship and a light source that creates the natural appearance we accept. Our paintings, on the other hand, are created "artificially" with pigments on a flat surface. We have to create the illusion of reality and harmony.

Science has shown us that light is made up of all color. Its primary colors, those that are the root of all the others, are the secondary colors of paint—that’s another topic to expand on at a later date. For now, just remember that light is an additive synthesis. It gets lighter and brighter as it's mixed. Pigment, on the other hand, is a subtractive synthesis. It gets darker and weaker when mixed. The three primaries of pigment color, from which all the other colors are derived, are yellow, red and blue. They share no relationship until mixed. When mixed, they create what is referred to as the secondary colors: orange, violet and green. These secondary colors share a common thread. Any combination of them completes the triad of color, creating natural harmony.

The theory of simultaneous contrast also plays a big part in why certain colors work better in relationship to one another (see my July 30, 2007 blog post for more). This visual phenomenon teaches us that everything is affected conversely according to what it is next to. For example, things look lighter when placed against dark, and warmer when placed against a cool. This is very useful when confronting green and helps to explain why one green pigment is never best for all situations.

Understanding these color theories is empowering but it still comes down to what is placed on your painting. Make a mark and then another. As the surface becomes covered, it will become apparent whether the green choices are working. If not, increase the presence of violet and orange (see blog post from June 9, 2008). When ask about green by students, I reference the color theories explained above and reply, “The secret of green is orange, and its friend is violet."

[pictured above] This image shows the three secondary colors placed next to each other, compared to the three primaries.




Monday, November 16, 2009 3:56:53 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Monday, November 09, 2009
The Problem With Green, Part 1
Posted by Richard

118-revisiting-green.jpgMalinda Wiesner recently sent a question concerning a statement I made during a presentation earlier this year: “Last May Richard McKinley presented a demonstration at the IAPS convention in Albuquerque. In that session he commented that there was a prejudice against the color green. There were other comments about how it worked with orange and purple. Could he clarify and elaborate on that?”

Thanks, Malinda, for your question. I'll break it into two blogs. We’ll address the prejudice against green in this posting, and next week, the use of green, orange and violet.

A few years ago while I was on a painting trip with legendary pastel plein air artist Glenna Hartmann, the question of how to handle green was posed. After a perfectly timed pause, she quietly responded, “I avoid it at all cost.” The ensuing discussion was very interesting. It seemed that every painter there had an issue with green.

As the discussion unfolded, it boiled down to a few issues. One of the most mentioned was the pigment used to make green pastels. What we see in nature is light reflected off of a surface. It shares a relationship with its surroundings as well as the bias of the light source. In our paintings, we're creating an illusion of what's real. Since we're incapable of placing real light on a surface, we have to use man-made colors that reflect light back to the observer, representing what we see.

These pigments have limitations, and this is where the issue begins. Most green pigments that are green by nature are artificial to foliage. Even the strongest blue-green in nature is rarely as intense as pure viridian or phthalo green pigment. Dealing with this often entails layering and intertwining other colors over them to produce a more natural appearing green; this is also an excellent method of uniting and harmonizing a painting.

Most manufactures that offer a limited number of color offerings in their pastel lines suffer from an abundance of these harsh tones. Other manufactures with extensive offerings usually mix pigments together to expand their color range. By mixing pigments together, they're duplicating the subtle temperature shifts that wet painters are capable of producing by mixing on their palettes. This produces more natural appearing green tones and has made painting the landscape with pastel much easier. If your pastel palette is small, it will serve you well to add some of these mixed green sticks, thus alleviating one of the issues with green.

In next week's bog I'll address how the other colors within your scene have an effect on your green pastel choices, and why orange and violet work with green.




MORE RESOURCES FOR ARTISTS

* Online Seminars for Fine Artists
* Instantly download fine art magazines, books & video workshops
* Sign up for your Artist's Network email newsletter & receive free fine art tips & demos




Monday, November 09, 2009 3:16:15 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [3]
# Monday, November 02, 2009
When is a Scene Best Left as a Photograph?
Posted by richard

117-Fall-color.jpg
Each year I eagerly await the arrival of fall and the turning of the leaves. The visual stimulation is always inspiring and becomes an annual obsession. While the northeastern area of the United States may be the most famous for their spectacular color show, all the other regions of the country have something to offer, too, even if it is more subtle. In southern Oregon, where I live, we're fortunate to have a diversity of trees, some deciduous and others evergreen. This produces wonderful variety and contrasts. The valley oaks turn to shades of orange and rust and the aspens in the high altitudes become a blaze of yellow. These are offset against the evergreen firs and pines to create a wonderful counterbalance.
 
117-Fall-color2.jpg As the color show unfolds, I always find myself attempting to paint these images. With a few exceptions, the paintings usually come up short. This year, after spending a couple of days totally immersed in spectacular fall possibilities, I began to think that this may be one of those nearly unpaintable situations. Unless painted on a grand scale, like the romantic Hudson River School of painting employed, it may be that these images are better left to the photographer. I'm not saying they can’t be done (see, for example, a good tip for dealing with fall color in my November 17, 2008 blog post), but often, the scens are so spectacular that no matter what we do, they end up looking fake.

This is sometimes referred to as the “sunset effect.” As beautiful as it is and as drawn to it as we are, the sunset usually doesn’t make for a good artistic painting. The inherent beauty is too much, allowing no room for personal expression, and is nearly impossible to put down on surface. These spectacular subjects, unless finessed properly, become a postcard. To make them work, we need to step back from the high drama of the moment and allow the viewer a little more to anticipate, engaging their imagination in how beautiful the subject matter might become. There is no hard and fast rule as to what works and what doesn't. Many artists have painted highly successful renditions. However, museums and galleries are rarely full of spectacular sunsets and over-saturated fall scenes. When they work, they work well, but when they don’t, we walk right past them as overly sweet, decorative wall art.

I will continue to be drawn to the beauty of what the autumn season has to offer and the breathtaking drama of a sunset, and, inevitably, will continue to attempt to communicate that beauty with pastel, but I do realize that some things might be better left to the photographer. This is not meant to diminish what some artists have accomplished by painting these subjects. I just realize that because it is beautiful, it doesn’t necessarily mean that it will make for a worthwhile painting.

Are there any other subjects you might place in this subjective "unpaintable" category? If so, please post a comment.
 
[pictured here] Photographs of this year's fall spectacle in southern Oregon.




Monday, November 02, 2009 5:24:51 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [12]
Google Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links