Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Search

Archives

<November 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Categories

Links










 Monday, October 26, 2009
A Matter of Consistency
Posted by richard

116-consistency.jpg
I was recently asked by a good pastel artist friend to address the problem of surface area consistency within our paintings. An instructor had counseled her a few years ago to create continuity between the structures and the surrounding landscape within her paintings. The quandary: Aren’t some areas greatly different in texture, like the side of a house and the surrounding trees? Shouldn’t they be painted differently to represent that difference?
 
This is an excellent point for discussion. Indeed, the appearance of the sky is much softer than the trees, and the skin of a youthful face smoother than the hair. While this is certainly true, we have to consider the nature of a painting; it's a window into a universe of the artist’s making. And, to be believable, there has to be a degree of harmonious cohesion.

In the consideration of how painters approach the separate areas of a painting, there are basically three aesthetics: The decorative attitude tends to apply a different technique of application to each area. Consider the “magic” television painters. The sky in their paintings was brushed in with a large soft brush; the trees pounced with a fan brush; and the rocks applied with a painting knife. Even though they are all made up of similar paint and have value and color consistency, they exist without shared application. The decorative nature of the application is the major appeal. These works can often appear gimmicky and wind up relegated to the spot above the sofa.

The second attitude is the application-consistent artist, which is the opposite extreme of the decorative. These paitners choose to use the same repetitive stroke of product application to create visual consistency, leaving the visual play of value, color and subject matter to tell the story. Think of Renoir using the same cupping stroke to apply all of his paint, yet we see the children at play in the park. The paint, or product, is not the element that grabs our attention. It is widely believed that the French Impressionists used this method to separate themselves from the bravura paint applications of their predecessors.

The third attitude is a bridging of the two mindsets. The artist may employ a wide array of product application and technique, but never isolates any given area. A sky may be dominated by soft applications but a few bold strokes will appear in the clouds, uniting it with the heavily painted textured trees. Since softness recedes and heavy texture comes forward, most of these painters use a variety of applications throughout the painting to heighten the appearance of depth. Areas are not singularly painted. Visual continuity is created through technique repetition, letting us believe that everything exists within the same visual space. My plein air painting Sentinel of the Lavender (above; pastel on UArt paper, 12x10) is an example of this aesthetic.
 
Look for Richard's latest column on the importance of focal point in the new November/December issue of The Pastel Journal on sale now at www.northlightshop.com.




10/26/2009 10:24:57 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [0]
 Monday, October 19, 2009
A Painterly Approach to Drawing
Posted by richard

115-1watersoluble-graphite.jpg
One of the methods pastel artists often use to place an initial drawing on their pastel surface is to use a graphite pencil. On a sanded surface—like Wallis, UArt and Art Spectrum—the graphite pencil is capable of a variety of lines. The marks flow easily and, by varying hand pressure, a multitude of effects can be produced. Since drawing is capable of producing lines—the one thing that doesn’t exist in nature—it is important to keep the mindset of a painter. Painters traditionally rely on shapes of value and color to define the painting instead of the line of the draftsman (another topic in itself). One way of keeping the attitude of a painter is to use a brush and make things soluble. Whether by spreading pastel with a wet solution, or a watercolor underpainting, a wet start helps to set up a painterly aesthetic before the application of dry pastel.

115-2watersoluble-graphitie.jpg
One means for combining graphite and a wet brush is to use one of the recently introduced water-soluble graphite pencils. These are available from a few manufacturers. The one I have the most experience with is Derwent, a British company with a reputation for artist grade materials. The pencil version is called Watersoluble Sketching. A solid graphite pencil/stick is available called Watersoluble GRAPHitone. Both are produced in various degrees of hardness, producing soft to harsh tones. These products are ideal for line and wash sketches as well as value understudies (see me June, 15, 2009 blog post on notan sketches).

If your surface is capable of handling water and is not prone to wrinkling (I work on mounted pastel paper surfaces to alleviate this issue), applying a drawing with either Watersoluble Sketching or GRAPHitone pencils and setting it with water can produce a painterly notan value understudy in advance of pastel applciation. Even though the graphite can be lifted with the addition of water, the act of making it wet helps to settle it into the surface, allowing for less interference with the color application. An additional advantage is that these pencils are easily sharpened using a regular pencil sharpener; sometimes less easily done with pastel pencils. Experiment on your pastel surface of choice and explore the limitless possibilities of these products. They may be the perfect marriage of drawing and painting you have been looking for.

[pictured above] At top is an initial drawing in which I've used Watersoluble GRAPHitone pencil on mounted Wallis Museum paper. The second image shows what this sketch looked like after I had spread the graphite with a brush and water.




10/19/2009 10:09:19 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [1]
 Monday, October 12, 2009
A Lesson From Sargent
Posted by richard

114-oyster-gathers-of-cancale[1].jpg
Recently, I was fortunate to have the opportunity to visit the current exhibit "Sargent and the Sea" at the Corcoran Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C. What a treat! Being a life-long fan of the expatriate master, I have tried, whenever possible, to experience his original work firsthand. As useful as books may be—especially for those of us who live in areas that don’t afford easy access to major museums—these can be our best resource—there is nothing like standing in the presence of the original work. It's always easy to identify the other painters in the museums and galleries; they are the ones closely analyzing the paintings as if they were on their own easels.

114-John-Singer-Sargent.jpgIn recent years, John Singer Sargent has gained in popularity and is being given the due respect many of us felt he always deserved. Although best known for his society portraits, this exhibit explores his other works, many of which represent his love of the landscape and document his travels to exotic locations.
 
The Corcoran has brought together more than 80 marine paintings and drawings from his early years as an artist, 1874 to 1879, when he was 18 through 23 years of age. The centerpiece of the exhibit is the larger of two oils depicting fisher-folk at Cancale, France, painted in 1878. This painting is in the permanent collection of the Corcoran and the smaller version is on loan from the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston. Recent discoveries of other seascapes and pictures have brought new attention to his work around these themes.

Not all of the reviewers have been overly impressed with this exhibit, but I think anyone who paints will find it informative and inspirational. What impressed me the most was the volume of sketches and studies executed in advance of the paintings. Sargent experiemnted with composition elements, adjusted figures, adding and sometimes deleting elements. Over this five-year period of time, while he was still working on his other subjects, he amassed innumerable studies and sketches, reinforcing his passion for his craft and his constant work ethic.
 
Many of us wish we were as good as Sargent but are not willing to invest the time and effort into the study he did throughout his life. After visiting this exhibit, I was both humbled and motivated to sketch, and to think more in advance of making my pastel marks. Next week, I have an opportunity to paint with a group of friends in a remote location in eastern Oregon for a few days. Instead of focusing on finished paintings, I plan to sketch and produce field studies. Hopefully, I will be able to suppress the urge to rush ahead to a signature. Good intentions are one thing, but the passion of the moment another.
 
"Sargent and the Sea" will be showing through January 3, 2010, then it travels to the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, from February 14 to May 23, 2010, and the Royal Academy of Arts, London, England from July 10 to September 26, 2010. For more information and a slideshow, visit the Corcoran online.

[above] En Route pour la pêche (Setting Out to Fish) by John Singer Sargent (1878; oil on canvas). Corcoran Gallery of Art, Washington, DC. Museum Purchase, Gallery Fund 17.2.

John Singer Sargent in his Studio, unidentified photographer (ca. 1884; 21 x 28 cm). [Artists in their Paris studios,], 1880-1890. Archives of American Art.







10/12/2009 9:46:06 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [1]
 Monday, October 05, 2009
Why a Painter Needs to Think Like a Sculptor
Posted by richard

113-topography.jpg
Working on a one-dimensional surface has its challenges. As magical as it can be to create the illusion of depth and form upon a flat surface, there are many lessons to be learned from the sculptor. The debate as to which is the nobler of the arts is one that can be traced as far back as the Renaissance. I won't venture into the debate here but will note that each has its important lessons.
 
I learned one such lesson many years ago and it has had a profound effect on my paintings every since. When starting out as a painter, I spent considerable time learning to draw and paint the portrait. After some years of effort, I had obtained a modicum of ability and, being young of years, felt I knew everything there was to know about art in general. As the years have ticked by, however, this has been greatly disproved. Because I was capable of painting a portrait, I decided to try my hand at sculpting the human head. Seated in front of my mound of clay that first day, I began the task. As I closely studied the model and the clay began to take form, I thought to myself: “Wait until the instructor sees my piece; I am going to receive such praise in front of the other students.” Finally, the instructor approached. As I eagerly awaited my impending praise, she leaned over my shoulder and turned the turntable the clay was resting on. As it rotated, I was shocked to discover that I had placed the ears an inch and a half from the eyes in depth. When looking straight on to the subject, that was the visible width but when the head was observed from the side, it was apparent the distance was closer to four or five inches in depth. This was a revelation! The sculptor deals in literal depth and the painter has to create the illusion. The painter must think like a sculptor, while the sculptor thinks like a sculptor.
 
Applying this to our paintings can be difficult. We become involved in the visual widths and heights of the objects we are painting, forgetting that they also have depth. Only an inch or two of a field may be visible, yet it represents one or two miles of distance. One means of reminding ourselves of the surfaces we are dealing with is to apply faint topographic lines on the initial drawing before attempting the painting. This simple visualization, though lost as the painting is started, is then internalized and we make wiser choices when dealing with the elements of edge, value, and color; ultimately producing a painting that has greater depth.
 
[pictured above] Before beginning the painting, apply simple topography lines to a drawing to assist in the visualization of form and depth.




10/5/2009 5:33:52 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [3]
Google Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links