Free Updates
Navigation
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 | | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 1 | | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
Categories
| December, 2008 (1) |
| November, 2008 (4) |
| October, 2008 (4) |
| September, 2008 (5) |
| August, 2008 (4) |
| July, 2008 (4) |
| June, 2008 (5) |
| May, 2008 (4) |
| April, 2008 (4) |
| March, 2008 (5) |
| February, 2008 (4) |
| January, 2008 (4) |
| December, 2007 (4) |
| November, 2007 (4) |
| October, 2007 (5) |
| September, 2007 (4) |
| August, 2007 (4) |
| July, 2007 (2) |
Links
|
 Monday, November 12, 2007
How to Organize Photo Reference: Part 2
Posted by richard
Last week, I talked about my organizational system for photos and slides. This week, I'll discuss my digital reference library. In photography, digital methods have become the dominant player. As many manufacturers have dropped consumer film production altogether, if you haven’t made the transition to digital yet, the time will come when you must. Digital photography is an economical way to capture a large volume of reference material, and it allows for accessible filing on a personal computer. As the cameras get more sophisticated (and affordable), it becomes easier to acquire quality reference material at very little expense. After the initial equipment purchases, there are no film or developing expenditures required. A few years ago I decided to migrate to digital for my studio reference material. As the images started to accumulate, I considered the best way to organize them for easy access and decided to adopt a similar system to the one I'd been using for film. I created folders on my computer labeled “reference images”, and I created subfolders with specific dates and locations for each set of digital images. It's a good idea, in case of a computer malfunction, to have back-ups of all these valuable files. You can burn disks or acquire an external hard drive to save these image files. You only have to experience one computer meltdown to realize how important this step is! Opening these folders with a computer program that has a “contact sheet layout” makes it easy to quickly scan through hundreds of individual images. Almost all of the photographic programs available, even the inexpensive ones, have this capability.  After you select the image you want to paint, you can choose to print it on a standard home printer or take it to a photography lab for processing with professional equipment. To duplicate the experience of working from slides, many artists are investing in a studio computer and monitor, and forgoing the hassle and expense of printing altogether. Large flat-screen monitors have become very affordable and relegating an old computer to studio duty can create an economical setup. Flat screen monitors don’t suffer from image-burn the way older CTR (TV-like) monitors do, making them a better choice. My monitor sits next to my easel (see photo), replacing the Telex Caramate slide projector I had used for years. Since these are digital images, you can easily save a copy of a selected image in another folder for quick reference without disturbing the original file. This facilitates easy access of reference images without having to spend a lot of precious time hunting. With a little knowledge of your photographic programs, you can make minor adjustments to the image creating a more useful reference. With a flick of my finger, I can zoom in and analyze a specific area or make the image black and white, allowing for study of the major value shapes. An added benefit is to set the monitor to go to screensaver after 20 minutes. When you see the swirling colors on the screen—take a break, step back and analyze the painting from a distance— then move the mouse bringing the image back on the screen for another session. This has become an invaluable tool in stopping me from over working a painting. Even though I will always crave the experience of working directly en plein air—I have found the use of an organized filing system and digital monitor a nice alternative when working in my studio.
11/12/2007 4:48:58 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Monday, November 05, 2007
How to Organize Photo Reference Material: Part 1
Posted by richard
I'm going to address the issue of working with and organizing photos and slides in two parts. I'm never happier than when I'm out painting directly from nature, but that's not always possible—especially living as I do in Oregon. So, decades ago, I began to photograph subject matter for reference and started building an extensive library of material. At that time print and slide photography was the norm. Since I often work on many paintings at once—in different stages—you
can imagine how difficult t would have been to keep organized without a
system in place. I started a filing system in which I mark my slides and prints by subject and date, giving each a code. My code is simple: a letter for each subject matter category, followed by a number representing its sequence in the film roll, and a date for when the image was shot or developed. A landscape image that was the 7th image developed on December 3rd, 1985, would have this code: L7 (12-3-85). It definitely takes time to mark each print and slide but certainly pays off when returning the reference to the file. I keep the negatives for the print photographs in the envelope in which they arrived, marked with the same code on the back of the prints. This allows me to find a negative quickly when I need a reprint or enlargement. To facilitate quick access to subject matter, I keep a logbook with a brief description of what is in each file. My log has been invaluable in helping me remember what was on a specific roll of film. Let's say I'm looking for high desert reference material containing structures; instead of leafing through thousands of images, I quickly scan the logbook.  When painting from slides, many artists utilize a daylight projection setup, allowing them to work in a brightly illuminated studio. You can project these using a rear-projection box made out of cardboard and frosted glass, using an existing slide projector. Or, you can purchase a unit like the “Telex Caramate” daylight projector screen (see photo at left). These sit near the easel, working much like a television screen. The advantage of slide projection is that you're looking at light versus printed images — which just reflect the light. Another benefit of these slide projection units is that I can begin the painting with the image slightly out of focus; this allows me to recognize big value and color shapes without focusing on detail. The image is then brought back into sharp focus to complete the final touches. Although I continue to use my photographic archives, I did eventually embrace the digital age and make use of a computer and monitor as well. In next week's blog, I'll share my digital reference system and explain how it has enhanced my studio painting experience.
11/5/2007 3:03:52 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Monday, October 29, 2007
Moving From Oils to Pastels
Posted by Richard
Q: I'm an oil painter who has purchased a set of pastels. What are the similarities between these two media and what tips can you give me to start me off in the right direction?  Pastel and oil share a strong kinship; they complement each other well. The skills gained from working in one greatly strengthen the other. My first paintings were oil and after a few years I was introduced to pastel by one of my mentors—an introduction for which I'm eternally grateful. Many observers comment that without close scrutiny, it's hard to tell my oils from my pastels. This is because I approach them both with the same attitude. Chamisa Storm (at top; oil, 16x24) and Toward the Rio (below; pastel, 10x14) illustrate this similarity. Both were started with a thin underpainting
followed with thicker applications of pigment. Many of my final
touches in oil are created with a palette knife loaded with heavy
paint; in pastel, this is duplicated with the side of a soft pastel stick.
 Working in oil has made me painterly (more in the fashion of paint). I hold and apply the pigment as if a brush is in my hand—instead of a drawing utensil. Pastel has made me more sensitive when working in oil to the tactile nature of applying pigment to surface. My application of both media is very similar: I tend to start with a thin underpainting that focuses on the big shapes and substructure of the scene (refer to my 2-part blog on underpainting). I then move to the lay-in of more pastel or oil, achieving just enough detail to explain what it is I'm painting. This method follows an old system used in traditional oil painting—working thin to thick. The mantra taught to these traditional oil painters applies well to pastel: thin to thick, soft to sharp, dark to light, and dull to bright. When working with an opaque medium it's best to try and follow this creed. Even though there are techniques of glazing in oil (the thin application of a darker transparent color over a lighter passage), it's basically an opaque medium, like pastel, and requires an incremental increase in paint volume to build up the upper passages, especially when working wet-into-wet. Pastel, of course, never dries (unless we spray it heavily with workable fixative), so it shares similarities to a layer of wet oil paint requiring the heavier application of pigment with each subsequent application. One of the ways pastel artists facilitate this is to work with their harder sticks in the early layers and graduate to the softer pastels for the final touches. Other media, like watercolor and acrylic, tend to dry quickly and require a different approach. Another similarity is that many oil painters work on a toned substrate, usually a warm tone for the landscape and a weak cool tone (like a gray green) for the figure and portrait. This is mirrored in the selections many pastel artists make when choosing a toned surface. Even though these two mediums share a lot of common qualities, there is a definite personality difference. Allow yourself time to become acquainted and experiment with each. You'll gain so much from the adventure.
10/29/2007 2:11:12 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, October 22, 2007
Giving and Receiving Critiques
Posted by Richard
 Criticism is a valuable part of our process as painters. Getting the opinion of others opens us up to possibilities we may have overlooked or not been capable of finding on our own. Being able to capably receive these opinions as well as dispense them is a skill we all need to acquire.  We work hard on our paintings and do our best with the knowledge and skills we have. At times this makes it difficult to hear what others might have to say. Many of us are seeking validation and approval instead of constructive criticism. Before opening yourself up to scrutiny, make the decision to learn something from the feedback. You will be better able to accept what you are told. Get a wide variety of criticism whenever possible and scrutinize the source before accepting the feedback. Comparing the diverse comments and looking for repeated observations may help us to address ongoing issues in our paintings. Make sure that the critic is able to explain objectively the reasoning behind his or her opinion. Simply stating that he or she likes or dislikes something is a matter of personal taste and serves only to flatter or tear down the individual receiving the comment. An explanation of the “why” behind the criticism will enable an artist to learn from it. Seek feedback from those you hold in high esteem—it is hard to ignore. But keep in mind that there's something to be gained from everyone. Many a good point has been made from someone that knows very little about painting. When critiquing others, try to be objective. Create a dialogue with the artist and get a feeling for what it was they were trying to communicate; put yourself in the artist's shoes and speak at his or her ability level. That way, you'll be better able to explain constructively your comments and, with your criticism, encourage the artist to move ahead to the next level. Your purpose is not to make the artist more like you, but to help strengthen ability. In the photo at top, the painters in my advanced plein air workshop on location in Bend, Oregon, meet for a group critique at the end of a long day of painting. Having feedback before approaching another painting day is useful; it helps solidify what's going well and what needs work, and can help expedite the learning experience. (Photo by Elloe Jeter)
The second photo was taken during an in-depth classroom critique that I arrange every five weeks as part of an ongoing class I teach in Medford, Oregon. Much may be learned from critiques of other students' work, and a dialogue is encouraged with the artist being critiqued. Critiques are a useful artistic tool, helping us to better communicate
and offering a reality check for what's successful and what needs
attention in our paintings. Always listen to your internal voice before handing your final decisions over to another. Remember, “It is but one person’s opinion." For tips on organizing (and operating) a local art critique group in your area, see the Professional Practices column, "The Art of the Critique Group," by Schelly Keefer and Edward McKeown, in the December issue of The Pastel Journal.
10/22/2007 3:11:29 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, October 15, 2007
What Is Aerial Perspective?
Posted by richard
 There are two types of perspective that artists use when painting and drawing. Aerial perspective is one and is described as the use of gradations in color and definition to suggest distance. The other, linear perspective, is what we call the use of parallel lines converging on the horizon to convey depth. Learning to handle these useful tools will heighten the appearance of distance in our paintings. Simply put, aerial perspective means the atmospheric distance between objects in a painting. Depending on our relationship to the objects, and the relative distance involved, this can be quite apparent. The heavier the atmosphere, the more pronounced the effect. Lower elevations that commonly have higher amounts of moisture in the air are the easiest to witness the effect. The drier the atmosphere, and the higher the elevation, the less apparent it becomes. If we were suspended above our scene (say, in the sky), we would understand the spacing of individual objects and would want to relate that distance in our paintings conceived from ground level. When observing the natural world, we confront two sources of light: the warm sun—the basis of all light—and the cool canopy of atmosphere that surrounds the earth. Think of the sun as a light bulb and the atmosphere as the lampshade. The sun strikes objects much the way a light bulb would in an indoor situation with the atmosphere as a lampshade diffusing the sunlight and casting a flat even light over a broad expanse. If we relate this analogy to the landscape, we understand that as things recede in the distance, they receive more and more atmospheric light, making them lighter and cooler. Artists have manipulated this tendency for a heightened effect of distance in their landscapes for centuries. I follow a simple recipe when applying aerial perspective to my paintings: make things cooler (bluer), lighter in value, and a little softer as they recede. I embrace the attitude that when we paint we manipulate the viewer into believing something is real that is not really there—a form of magic. It's but a flat surface with pigment applied. By utilizing the effect of aerial perspective, artists can do just that. In my painting, Long Shadows (above), I purposely made the large cast shadow in the foreground warmer and darker near the bottom, though in reality it looked pretty mucht he same. The effect is that you feel a heightened sense of distance as you journey through the painting back to the old stone structure.
10/15/2007 9:44:23 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, October 08, 2007
How do you frame your work?
Posted by richard
 Framing your work is like choosing clothing. Dependingon the task, you need to dress appropriately. I have two different presentation methods for my finished pastels: One is to use a traditional mat and frame; the other is to frame in the fashion of an oil painting. Depending on the piece, one of these options usually works well. The most important purpose of framing pastels is to protect them from damage. Unlike paintings that dry and are able to be handled with little concern of damage, pastels are fragile and are better protected when framed properly. Glass is almost always used to protect the pastel surface from touch and moisture. Some artists are experimenting using applied varnishes and mediums over their pastels to preserve them. Since this alters the appearance and requires advanced planning, I haven't experimented with it—yet, that is. Modern advances have given us the ability to use low-reflection (AR) glass and ultraviolet protected (museum) glass, which greatly enhances the appearance of the painting. Once prohibitively expensive, the prices for these have come down, and many pastel artists are spending the funds for these framing products. Personally, I think it has made a difference with my galleries in terms of where they are able to display my work, and consequently, in sales.  To mat or not to mat, that is the second question. Since most pastel artists believe it's best to separate the glass from the pastel surface, the easiest and most traditional method has been to use paper matting between the finished painting and the frame and glass. If you choose to use a mat, make sure it is ph neutral or 100 percent rag. Old pulp paper mats were highly acidic and over time could damage the painting. I usually use a cloth-covered matting either of a raw or bleached linen variety (see photo at top). Instead of double matting, I opt for a wood fillet that accents the outer frame; this adds an accent as well as added depth between the glass and painting. The general rule on width of mat is wider on small paintings and narrower on large ones. Traditionally, a little extra width is placed at the bottom to weight the piece. Many pastel artists have decided to go without mats in order to frame in a traditional oil motif. The recent popularity of the plein air or American Impressionist frame has made a good selection of ready-made, elegant frames available. Small plastic spacers (purchased from an art supply or framing store) are easily attached between the painting and glass on the inside of the frame. Tucked out of sight under the lip of the frame, all the viewer sees is the outer frame and the finished painting (see photo above). One difficulty of using this system is that it works best if the pastel surface is rigid or the paper has been mounted to a rigid substrate since lightweight pastel papers are prone to slipping and wrinkling. When it comes to choosing the color or value of the frame or matting, I rely on my understanding of simultaneous contrast. If I want to accentuate the darks in a painting, I'll choose a slightly lighter frame and visa versa. The same holds true for color: a warm frame will make a painting appear cooler and a cool frame, warmer. The more neutral the frame, the more the painting will shine. Since we rarely know where our work will end up, it's best to frame simply and to showcase the painting. Leave the decorative framing for the interior decorator that understands the environment where the painting will reside.   
10/8/2007 1:31:49 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, October 01, 2007
Do you have any tips for working from photographs?
Posted by richard
 Although I've been concentrating on plein air tips for the most part on this blog, I do often use photographic material as a reference when painting in my studio or in a classroom. It's a useful tool and has allowed me to record details of many places and things. There are three basic ways a photograph differs from our perception. Understanding them will allow us to better work from photographic reference.  [left] photo reference for Opal Evening [below] Opal Evening (pastel on pumice grit board, 16x20) by Ricahrd McKinleyFirst, value ranges will be exaggerated. Film—and now digital formats—have limitations on their ability to record the full range of light and dark visible to the human eye. Digital is getting better and future advances will make it more accurate, but for the time being, it's still limited. Most photographs are exposed for the light, allowing for more detail to be recorded in those areas. This leaves the shadows underexposed and lacking reportable texture. If we exposed for the darker areas, the lights would blow out and show too little detail. For this reason, it's often wisest to shoot one exposure for the shadows and another for the lights. By using both photos as reference, it becomes easier to relate natural variations within the darks and lights, and comes closer to what we see. Second, color is easily misrepresented. Films are made for certain lighting conditions and, used outside those close parameters, can shift toward a warm or cool bias. With digital, the white balance (or color bias) is the key to accurate color representation. Don’t forget, the camera doesn’t know what you're taking a picture of. It just averages everything unless you manually override it to respond to the situation. A little reading of your owner’s manual section on white balance can help you adjust your digital camera for more accurate images. Third, focal-plane manipulation, referred to as the "depth of field," can alter the focus by allowing only one upright plane to be in sharp focus. Everything in front, as well as behind, that plane will be blurred. Depth of field may also be manipulated to produce sharp focus from the tip of your toes to the horizon. The human eye sees in a focused cone, and everything around our area of focused attention will become softer. So, don’t be fooled by the manipulated depth of field of the photograph. It's important to remember that nothing comes close to working directly from the source, one on one. Processing the visual information gathered through the eye, analyzed by the brain, and felt by the heart is an integral part of being a representational painter. The photograph is an artificial representation, easily manipulated and limited by its physical restraints. Don’t let it use you; learn to use it, and never accept it as fact.
10/1/2007 2:15:20 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, September 24, 2007
How elaborate should I make the initial drawing?
Posted by richard
 The amount of drawing placed on the pastel surface before painting is an individual choice. When I refer to a drawing on the pastel surface, I mean the placement of the composition—an arrangement of shapes and values. Some painters need an elaborate drawing to feel comfortable, while others place just a few marks.  Consider which surface you'll be working on and what product you'll be using to do the drawing. Depending on the surface, many products may be used—drawing pencils, vine charcoal and pastel pencils are a few of the most common. I use all three but depend on a simple 2b or HB pencil most of the time. Since the majority of my work is done on a sanded surface, such as Wallis paper, I enjoy the fluid way the pencil imparts a mark, flowing like a stick of margarine onto a warm plate. My drawings for Fir Island Afternoon, top left, and Tumalo Pines, left, were done on Wallis white museum-grade paper mounted on Museum board. (To see the underpainting and finished painting for Fir Island Afternoon, refer to my previous blog post.) To correct a misplaced stroke, I wipe it off with a chamois or strong paper towel. Although a ghost image still remains, it's easy to cover. Also consider whether you'll be utilizing an underpainting. If you plan to underpaint, it's best to experiment first to see how the product used for the drawing affects the outcome. Some are prone to smearing and, if applied heavily, may gray and weaken the color being applied. No matter what I use for the drawing, I blow off any loose dust. I'm not worried about loosing the drawing once the underpainting begins, but I don’t want to alter the appearance by having too much of the drawing materials mixing in. Another factor to consider: What will it take for you to feel comfortable before applying pastel? I utilize a series of thumbnail sketches before starting a painting. These help to solidify my concept and help me work through any problems I might confront with the make-up of the scene. Even after completing a series of thumbnail sketches, I do a rather involved drawing on my pastel surface. I refer to this stage as the “sensitivity.” I take my time, allowing myself to become tuned in to the subject. Students often ask: Why spend the time only to lose it or cover it up? My reply is that this acts as my warm-up and helps me slip into the painting mindset I need to paint with nthusiasm and clarity, even though the majority will be lost once I apply pastel. Having physically worked through the drawing, I have internalized the elements of the scene. I realize this may be frustrating for some and a waste of time for others, but for me it is an invaluable step. Ask your pastel painting questions in a comment here, or email The Pastel Journal at pjedit@fwpubs.com. For more about Richard McKinley, visit his website.
9/24/2007 1:33:17 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, September 17, 2007
How do I set the right expectations?
Posted by richard
Question: I have heard you say "lower your expectations" and "expect to fail." Is this an attitude for workshops, plein air painting and the studio? At what point should an artist approach a painting with the attitude of creating a jewel—if not a diamond, maybe a treasure? I am glad for the opportunity to clarify. I often generalize and this is a good example. When you heard me say “lower your expectations” and “expect to fail," it was in the context of a plein air workshop and I was speaking with beginners in mind, not advanced painters. What I have noticed over the years is that we all come to our painting with enthusiasm, eager to paint that masterpiece. But, until we master the necessary skills required to accomplish that end—and even then it is often a struggle—we will come up short and be disappointed. This often leads to an internalized sense of failure and can lead to giving up. Or, in the case of working on location, going back to working from photographs in the studio. Painting on location is difficult for even the well-seasoned artist, and instead of expecting your best work, I encourage painters who are new to the experience to expect to fail a few times, and to not expect a painting as good as what they are capable of in their studios. With time, patience and a bit of tenacity, they will get more confident and then it's appropriate to expect great things. We are a society that's used to everything in an instant, and after watching a demonstration or seeing the results from another artist, it's easy to expect the same level of competence from ourselves. Just as an infant falls when he first attempts to walk, so will most of us when we first attempt to paint on location—or try something new. With time, though, we'll be walking with confidence and not expecting to fall. Let me be clear: I want everyone to stand before his or her blank surface and paint with confidence and passion. I have high hopes for my paintings and firmly believe we have to paint with the erect posture of a confident person not cowering and unsure, but it's also wise to take stock of where we are on this journey and celebrate those little steps. A rough stone needs the skilled hands of a jeweler before it becomes a gem, and a lot of diamond dust is produced along the way in creating that treasure!
9/17/2007 10:45:05 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, September 10, 2007
What is your setup for painting en plein air with pastels?
Posted by richard
 Working with pastel on location is a rewarding process, facilitating immediate spontaneous applications of pigment to surface. The anxiety is transporting our fragile pastels into the dangerous world. If you have ever spilled your pastel case and spent the rest of the day picking up bits and pieces, you know how important it is to have a stable setup. The first consideration is to organize a strong case with the least amount of pastels. It's difficult to know which sticks to select until you've worked on location for awhile. For my palette layout, I limit myself to a selection that represents the color wheel, value scale and a neutral range of warm and cool colors. Then I'll make changes to my field palette depending on where I'll be painting. In areas such as the Northeast, for example, I might add a wider range of greens and blue/violets and decrease the red/orange family. Whereas when painting in the Southwest, the opposite approach would better suit the situation. I always know I can make final touches back in the studio where I have all my pastel choices. Next, be sure to have a stable system for holding your pastel palette and surface. One of the oldest and most widely used is the French easel. The open drawer holds the pastel case, which may be secured with a bungee cord. The inner drawer is useful for holding miscellaneous items, and the pastel surface attaches to the easel for painting and transport. If weight and size are a concern, a half French easel is a good solution. All-in-one boxes are a convenient and compact alternative to the traditional French easel and separate pastel case. They are available from a variety of vendors and attach to a sturdy camera tripod. Another useful item is an umbrella which shades the working area and keeps an even light on the painting and pastel palette. Make sure it's white, black or neutral in color, so it doesn’t create a color cast. Smaller, sturdy models have become available from suppliers of plein air equipment. Wind is always a problem, and never more so than for the pastel artist. Picking up a turned over oil setup is one thing, but dealing with a couple hundred pastels strung across a field is another! For this reason it's advisable to weigh down or secure the easel as much as possible when wind is present. Recently, I've had good results using a model available from Artworks Essentials that allows the umbrella to lift off in severe wind. Other items I bring along are: extra pastel paper; a sketchbook for thumbnail composition sketches; a small digital camera to record the scene and record the stages of the painting; a small watercolor palette for possible underpainting; a few oil bristle brushes; Viva-brand paper towels; a small secure container of mineral spirits for spreading the pastel if needed; a few 2B drawing pencils for sketching and drawing; a good wide-brimmed hat to shade my eyes; water; bug spray; and sunscreen. Some of these are stored inside the French easel and the rest in a small backpack. Learning to travel light and still have the things we need is an ongoing process. If I haven’t used something for awhile, I remove it and lighten the load. I have wondered (all plein air painters must at one time or another) why I go through it—lugging my equipment around, standing in the sun, getting eaten by insects, and fighting the constantly changing light. But, after experiencing the allure of natural light, the sensitivity gained from a tactile relationship, and the differences in my work because of these, I've become totally hooked!
9/10/2007 11:45:51 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, September 03, 2007
How do you hold your pastel stick and what size are the sticks you use?
Posted by richard
We each find our individual comfort zone when holding and applying pastel, but there are a few factors that will affect the outcome. First, to what surface will the pastel be applied? Every surface accepts the pastel differently and only through experimentation will it be clear how you wish to apply the pastel. Secondly, what brand of pastel is being applied? Some brands of pastel flow like butter onto the surface and others scrape across in a gritty fashion. For this reason most of us, myself included, prefer to have an assortment of brands at our fingertips. The third factor is how much pressure will be used, and this is the thing we have the most control over. Inherently, we might have a light touch or a heavy hand, but with practice, can learn to control the pressure applied. Facilitating a varied touch will allow for a variety of applications. ![6-stick-image[1].jpg](http://pastelpointersblog.artistsnetwork.com/content/binary/6-stick-image%5B1%5D.jpg) To hold the pastel stick, I use a “three finger” hold. I came to pastel having worked in oil for a number of years and this influenced my technique. I wanted the pastel to go onto the surface like a brush applying paint and found that by holding the stick between my thumb, forefinger and middle finger I was able to utilize its side for broad strokes. If I rock it up slightly, I create a hard and soft edged stroke. If I tip it up even more and work with the forward edge and dab it, I create smaller dashes. These motions all related to common brushwork I'd been using in my wet painting that have stayed with me all of these years. As for the size of the sticks, my choice varies depending on the size of strokes desired. Most of the pastel pieces in my cases range from a third- to a half-stick (for an average size major pastel brand, about an inch to an inch-and-a-half). For a larger painting I would use larger pastel sticks. This may be why most of my paintings range from 9x12 to 18x24, as the sticks I have allow for strokes that work well within that size. As I said at the start, we each come into our own technique with time and experience. Mine is to think like a wet painter and apply the pastel as if it were a brush stroke. A nice side effect of this is that my oils and pastels are hard to tell apart because they both retain a similar application, which represents my style. If you have questions for Richard, make a comment here on the blog, or email your question to The Pastel Journal editors at pjedit@fwpubs.com
9/3/2007 5:03:53 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, August 27, 2007
What do you mean by the value scale of the landscape?
Posted by richard
When I refer to the value scale of the landscape, I'm referencing the amount of illumination in the landscape. So much of what I teach is generalized and this is no different. Every lighting situation is diverse and should be evaluated separately. Having said that, I want to stress the importance of seeing natural outdoor lighting differently from controlled interior lighting. Sunlight and the reflected skylight are very strong and generally create a higher key—brighter saturated illumination. Most of us started painting in an indoor situation either from the still life or portrait. We learned about light falling on form and how to relate this to a value scale running from black to white—with black representing the absence of light and white the most intense reflective light. A numbering system is often attached to this scale, facilitating the ability to reference values in our notes. I've always used 0 for black and 10 for white. Other artists have reversed the numbering but I prefer 0 for black, as it represents the absence of light, and 10 for white representing 100 percent light; it just seems logical for my way of thinking. Using this scale we find that 5 is middle value. Since most of us were taught to use this scale, we bring its influence outdoors and relate it to what lies before us in the landscape. This will almost always produce darker paintings that are more kindred to the interior still life than the highly illuminated landscape. For this reason, I've encouraged students to represent the dark masses with value 3, moving the middle value from 5 to approximately value 6.5. Darker accents may be added later that fall below value 3.  By moving the scale up to a range of 3 to 10, and massing in the major values representing the dark, middle and light, I end up with a more illuminated painting that better communicates the natural light found in nature. The true job for us all is to see light accurately. By using a value scale, we might better see that light! “Color is an inborn gift, but appreciation of value is merely training of the eye, which everyone ought to be able to acquire.” — John Singer Sargent
8/27/2007 2:21:07 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
|